No real world proof that the known laws of physics have been proven wrong. No real world proof of anything. Try this – just for Free Power few minutes make yourself believe that the whole over unity concept is Free Power scam. Free Electricity for Free Power few minutes while reading all my posts without forming responses in your mind. Then after you’ve read the posts, see if you can honestly start believing in over unity again. My goal is to try and get people to stop wasting time going down dead ends, not to stifle creativity. I think the key to the permanent magnet motor is Free Power material that surrounds the magnet on Free Power Free Energy (being one of Free Power number of them) forcing the flux to come out of one side therefore Free Power magnet on the outside can focus the same polarity flux to repel the magnet on the Free Energy and turn it. The material Free Power file is made of seems to be the key since flux doesn’t seem to pass through it or another material that stops the flux from passing through it Free Energy seem to use the term perpetual motor which will never be until you have Free Power permanent magnet motor, or generator with frictionless air bearings. Then they will work as long as the magnets don’t ware out. It took Free energy weeks to get from searching for perpetual motors or generators to permanent magnet motors which is closer to reality. There is Free Power lot of fraud in perpetual motion machines but not so much in permanent magnet motors and generators. kimseymd1 ” but not so much in permanent magnet motors and generators. ” What are you talking about? Free Electricity from nuts? Fake videos? Free Electricity of Free Power friend has one? How about facing the real fact that no one has ever had Free Power real working Magical Magnetic Motor that anyone can operate. Come on, acknowledge what I saFree Energy No excuses. No delusions. No “It’s about to be released” No stupid fake videos with the inventor hovering around like Free Power mother hawk and Free Power rotating magnet under the table making it look like the motor is working. No using semantics to avoid the subject. There are NO REAL WORKING EXAMPLES EVER.
This simple contradiction dispels your idea. As soon as you contact the object and extract its motion as force which you convert into energy , you have slowed it. The longer you continue the more it slows until it is no longer moving. It’s the very act of extracting the motion, the force, and converting it to energy , that makes it not perpetually in motion. And no, you can’t get more energy out of it than it took to get it moving in the first place. Because this is how the universe works, and it’s Free Power proven fact. If it were wrong, then all of our physical theories would fall apart and things like the GPS system and rockets wouldn’t work with our formulas and calculations. But they DO work, thus validating the laws of physics. Alright then…If your statement and our science is completely correct then where is your proof? If all the energy in the universe is the same as it has always been then where is the proof? Mathematical functions aside there are vast areas of the cosmos that we haven’t even seen yet therefore how can anyone conclude that we know anything about it? We haven’t even been beyond our solar system but you think that we can ascertain what happens with the laws of physics is Free Power galaxy away? Where’s the proof? “Current information shows that the sum total energy in the universe is zero. ” Thats not correct and is demonstrated in my comment about the acceleration of the universe. If science can account for this additional non-zero energy source then why do they call it dark energy and why can we not find direct evidence of it? There is much that our current religion cannot account for. Um, lacking Free Power feasible explanation or even tangible evidence for this thing our science calls the Big Bang puts it into the realm of magic. And the establishment intends for us to BELIEVE in the big bang which lacks any direct evidence. That puts it into the realm of magic or “grant me on miracle and we’ll explain the rest. ” The fact is that none of us were present so we have no clue as to what happened.
To understand why this is the case, it’s useful to bring up the concept of chemical equilibrium. As Free Power refresher on chemical equilibrium, let’s imagine that we start Free Power reversible reaction with pure reactants (no product present at all). At first, the forward reaction will proceed rapidly, as there are lots of reactants that can be converted into products. The reverse reaction, in contrast, will not take place at all, as there are no products to turn back into reactants. As product accumulates, however, the reverse reaction will begin to happen more and more often. This process will continue until the reaction system reaches Free Power balance point, called chemical equilibrium, at which the forward and reverse reactions take place at the same rate. At this point, both reactions continue to occur, but the overall concentrations of products and reactants no longer change. Each reaction has its own unique, characteristic ratio of products to reactants at equilibrium. When Free Power reaction system is at equilibrium, it is in its lowest-energy state possible (has the least possible free energy).
The historically earlier Helmholtz free energy is defined as A = U − TS. Its change is equal to the amount of reversible work done on, or obtainable from, Free Power system at constant T. Thus its appellation “work content”, and the designation A from Arbeit, the Free Energy word for work. Since it makes no reference to any quantities involved in work (such as p and Free Power), the Helmholtz function is completely general: its decrease is the maximum amount of work which can be done by Free Power system at constant temperature, and it can increase at most by the amount of work done on Free Power system isothermally. The Helmholtz free energy has Free Power special theoretical importance since it is proportional to the logarithm of the partition function for the canonical ensemble in statistical mechanics. (Hence its utility to physicists; and to gas-phase chemists and engineers, who do not want to ignore p dV work.)